株式会社 医学生物学研究所



トップページ>病理・細胞診検査>関連文献

関連文献 −細胞採取− Cervical Sampling Related Articles −

本ページの下記、文献リストは紹介であり、著作権法に準じて文献のお取り寄せ等は各位で実施ください。

Peer-reviewed Cervical Sampling publications

  1. 赤松節、姫路由香里、松田真由美、他： 子宮ガン集団検診における細胞採取器具の評価：日本臨床細胞学会雑誌 第43巻 第3号 161-165,2004
  2. Day SJ, O'Shaughnessy DL, O'Connor JC, Freund GG. Additional collection devices used in conjunction with the SurePath Liquid-Based Pap Test broom device do not enhance diagnostic utility. BMC Womens Health. 2004 Sep 13;4(1):6.
  3. Tibbs RF, Wong JY, Logrono R. Enhancing recovery of endocervical component on gynecologic cytology specimens processed by thin-layer technology. Acta Cytologica 2003; 47(2):172-6.
  4. Roberson J, Connolly K, St John K, Eltoum I, Chhieng DC. Accuracy of reporting endocervical component adequacy--a continuous quality improvement project. Diagn Cytopathol. 2002 Sep;27(3):181-4.
  5. Risbert B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B. Cervex-Brush vs Spatula and Cytobrush. A Cytohistologic Evaluation. Journal Reproductive Medicine 1997 Jul;42(7):405-8
  6. Jarvi K. Cervex-Brush versus Vaginal-Cervical-Endocervical (VCE) triple Smear Techniques in Cervical Sampling. Cytopathology 1997 Aug;8(4):282-8
  7. Risberg B, Andersson A, Zetterberg C, Nordin B. Cervex-Brush vs. spatula and Cytobrush. A cytohistologic evaluation. J Reprod Med. 1997 Jul;42(7):405-8.
  8. Sparrow MJ, Fauck R, Gupta RK. A trial of two methods of taking cervical smears: the Aylesbury spatula plus cytology brush compared to the Cervex broom. N Z Med J. 1997 Sep 26;110(1052):356-8.
  9. Buntinx F. Brouwers M. Relation Between Sampling Device and Detection of Abnormality in Cervical Smears: a Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Quasi-Randomized Studies. BMJ 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1285-90
  10. Kavak ZN, Eren F, Pekin S, Kullu S. A randomized Comparison of the 3 Papanicolaou Smear Collection Methods. Australian N Z Journal Obstetrics Gynaecology 1995 Nov;35(4):446-9
  11. Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW. Evaluation of the Endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in Pregnant Women. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1994 Oct;84(4):539-43
  12. Cannon JM, Blythe JG. Comparison of the Cytobrush Plus Plastic Spatula with the Cervex-Brush for Obtaining Endocervical Cells. Obstetrics ＆ Gynecology 1993 Oct;82(4 PT 1):569-72
  13. McCord ML, Stovall TG, Summitt RL., Coleman SA. Cervical Cytology:a Randomized Comparison of Four Sampling Methods. American Journal Obstetrics ＆ Gynecology. 1992 Jun;166 (6 Pt 1):1772-7
  14. Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Boxnaes J, Beatie RT. The Optimal Technique for Obtaining a Papanicolaou Smear with the Cervex-Brush. Journal Family Practice. 1992 Mar 34(3):276-80
  15. Hutchinson M, Fertitta L, Goldbaum B, Hamza M, Vanerian S. Cervex-Brush and Cytobrush. Comparison of Their Ability to Sample Abnormal Cells for Cervical Smears. Journal Reproductive Medicine. 1991 Aug; 36 (8):581-6
  16. Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud JC, Rietveld WJ. Analysis of Five Sampling Methods for the Preparation of Cervical Smears. Acta Cytologica 1989 Nov-Dec; 33(6): 843-848

Non-peer reviewed publication(s)

  1. Bonfiglio TA, Erozan YS. Gynecologic Cytopathology. Book chapter. Atkison KM. Specimen Collection and Determinants of Adequacy. Lippencott-Raven. 1997.